Critical point Essay Example for Free

Critical point Essay Furthermore, its peculiar characteristics were also likened and even attributed to the psychological condition known as multiple personality disorder (MPD), because it assumes and behaves in two distinct phases, occurring as a high-density liquid or as a low-density liquid which was then normally thought to be quite impossible theoretically. The idea that water remains in liquid form even if it is in its super-cooled state when subjected to temperatures well below its ordinary freezing point (Introduction section, para.3-4), can then have a strong memory recall. Finally, simile was also used in the discussion of the â€Å"critical point. † A â€Å"critical point† was defined as the â€Å"set of pressures and temperatures at which a liquid changes from one form to the other† (Terms of Confinement section, para. 17). The critical point of water, or any other substance for that matter, was compared to the summit of the Mount Everest that â€Å"rises in a gradual manner and distorts the terrain all around it (Gaidos as cited in Stanley, Just a Phase section, para.6-8). † The interplay of logos and pathos, from which the blueprint of the author’s ideas was contained, was explored further in the way the article was outlined. It was divided into five parts, and with the exemption of the introductory paragraphs, contained four subheadings. The general idea was developed first before setting out to a detailed discussion. The title was catchy, as well as the subheadings and used colloquial speech to acquaint the readers to concepts that may be unfamiliar to them. This functioned as an expedient for logical arrangement, but more importantly, it meant to capture and retain the reader’s attention. The subheadings seemed to serve as an advertising ploy, operating on the stratagem of bite-sized packaging, to give the reader an impression of venturing in an uncomplicated, easy reading. For what could be the purpose of a piece of writing that supersedes the aim to persuade, inform or entertain other than to keep the reader reading. Persuasion, information, and entertainment work best when and if the author manages to contain the reader, from the first to the last paragraph of his/her work. In the course of the exposition, however, the use of scientific jargon and a technical writing style was more or less retained. The introductory paragraphs provided an overview of the article and the author began by discussing the properties of water, explaining how its molecules behave and how growing evidence reveal peculiarities in its nature. The succeeding paragraphs under the different subheadings elaborated on these matters citing the statements made and the experiments performed by noted physicists and scientists. In the last subheading, the article drew emphasis on the practical benefits posed by the integrated findings and hinted at exposing another set of data in the future that would add up to already established yet still growing collection of evidences. The shift allowed the article to maintain a credible tone and avoid appearing watered-down or downgrading to oversimplification. It was an effective synthesis of technical and informal language in journalistic writing, which proved useful in the sense that balance was made possible to be achieved in the logos and pathos aspects of the writing. The author was able to anticipate the needs of its targeted audience by giving them accessible grasp to scientific information, whereas not falling short on educating on a considerably theoretical viewpoint. Taken as a whole, to those who are rational enough to acknowledge that these discoveries were just products of scientific inquiry, this article might be seen on a neutral ground. The article was, for the most part, informative and there was no significant amount of persuasion leaning to any kind of ideology involved. It would leave the reader to extract any implication it might set forth during and after the course of reading and therefore enabling the reader to think for his own. Whatever the case may be, the author of the article cannot have the power to dictate how the readers may think, however unbiased or unprejudiced she may be in presenting the article. It is inherent in the topic itself to stir up ideologies, whether they are complementary or conflicting. On one hand, the facts that were cited in the article concerning the importance of the so-called weirdness of water in the environment and the ecosystem, even though, it may not be the similar case for everyone, might implicitly induce a real life pondering of thoughts among those who believe in why and how the water was created as such by their own notion of the Creator. This may have the capacity to strengthen people’s beliefs into considering that everything is really in the proper alignment and that everything is working perfectly however peculiar some things behave in the lens of scientific investigation. When a belief or even just an extension of that belief was affirmed by, in this case, research or scientific evidence, the tendency of the reader who in this sense is also the believer is to embrace that new piece of information and even so, when this information was delivered using simple words in a logical manner. On the other side of the coin, the emphasis the author placed pertaining to conducting further experimentations and intensive laboratory researches in the latter part of the article might also be alarming to some who might see it as man’s way taking control over nature and playing the role of a god. References: Gaidos, Susan (2008). Supercool, and Strange. In Science News Online. Retrieved January 26, 2008, from http://www. sciencenews. org/articles/20080126/bob9. asp